The Geomagnetic Field Decay / Solar Radiance Increase
[PLEASE USE CONTROL (+) FOR ZOOMS AND CONTROL (0) FOR NORMAL VIEW]. To see other BSMRA sites the BSM Research Associates Integrated Websites Selection. Also please use included PDFs and WORD files for higher resolution if desired.[PLEASE USE THE ASSOCIATED PDF FILES TO ZOOM GRAPHS AND PICTURES]. The Maxwell-Lorentz Force protects the Earth from lethal, high energy, charged particle incidence. GLOBAL WARMING IS PRIMARILY A FUNCTION OF WATER VAPOR GENERATED FROM THE 330 MILLION CUBIC MILES OF OCEAN, NOT PREDOMINANTLY CARBON DIOXIDE (click on frame below addressing global heating). As the Earth continues to decelerate in its anglular velocity through the Sun's interplanetary magnetic field, the electrical currents generated within the Earth's geocore commensuratley decreases. As these currents decrease the geomagnetic field, generated by these induced currents, likewise decreases. As the geomagnetic field (GMF) dies so this planet becomes increasingly exposed to lethal radiatin. The Maxwell-Lorentz Force is F=qE + qvxB; where F is the protective deflection force; q is the charge on the high energy particles streaming from the Sun and interstellar (and intergalactic) space; E is the electric field of the geocore, and B is the geocore's current's induced geomagnetic field. The first appearance of the so-called Lorentz force appeared in 1861 by Professor James Clerk Maxwell: On Physical Lines of Force; London, Edinburgh Journal of Science; ;March 1861; p. 342; Equation 77, which is vxB in scalar form (see enclosed PDF). As the induced geomagnetic flux density decreases due to deceleration and magnetic diffusion processes in the geocore, so does the deflection force disintegrate. Geomagnetic polarity changes are not associated not associated with this Maxwell-Lorentz deflection force equation. Neither is assumed polarity change involved in INCREASE of the the B-field. All spontaneous changes in polarity will, in accord with the Second Law of Thermodyanmics, result in further decay of the primary geomagnetic feld (GMF). This is assuming of course that the so-called geomagnetic field reversals could occur at all. Paleomagnetic data assumes the utility of potassium-argon (K-Ar) reliability for dating the basalt basins of the Global Fracture System. Very foolish approach since NO radiometric dating method yields time past 5740 years (approximately radio carbon). Also the orientation of so-called "paleo" magnetic rocks are not stable and the assumed orientation of the the indigeneous magnetic fields of such rocks, are altered continually since the lithospheric destruction some 4,500 years ago. In reality, paleomagnetic assurances are evolutionary dogma, that is all, and certainly not geophysical science. (See the appropriate PDFs). Global heating results in vastly increased evaporation rates over the oceans and large rivers systesm. Condensation and precipitation of the water vapor results in rain-generated floods and increased snow flux rates. The new half-life values for the decay of the geomagnetic field has been calculated to be 684.18 years. This value is not constant and in fact varies as input values of to the geomagnetic field induced intensity varies, as well as time of measurement. Notwithstanding, the overall value of the GMF's half-life continues in reduction. In effect the time required for the field to reduce one half of its effective deflective force (EDF) is becoming less; even as the primary geomagnetic field continues to disintegrate. Current frames address the global temperature increase as a function of decrease in planetary rotation; data obtained from the International Earth Rotation System (IERS) for 2010. FULL TRANSLATION OF THIS PAPGE [http://www.freetranslation.com/]
Full Translation of this page: (1.) Select the translation icon here; (2.) From the SDL translation site select Web Translation; (3.) Enter http://smtp.antelecom.net/blogs/bsmaGMF/ into the location bar (white box) and be sure to select the language you desire; then press Translate.
Included in this section: International Geomagnetic Reference Field Data (IGRF) of the National Geophysics and Data Center (NGDC). This is analysis which is ongoing at BSM Research Associates (BSMRA) as we track the decline of the Earth's geomagnetic field and its protective deflective force capability. The Earth's geomagnetic field (GMF) continues to decay in accordance with the geomagnetic diffusion and intensity decay equations formulated in this section; and commensurate with the reduction of the rotation of the Earth's conductive geo-core through the Sun's interplanetary magnetic field. The 1900-2010 IGRF half-life value (time required for the geomagnetic field to reduce in cosmic ray deflective force by 50%: 684.18 years.
New 2010 Barnes Slusher Paiva IGRF Geomagnetic Field Intensity Decay Values.pdf
Conversion of Barnes ESSA Slusher Paiva to Geomagnetic IGRF Model.pdf 
T.G. Barnes/ C.A. Paiva_BSMRA:IGRF Convergent DataF.xls
http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/greenwch.shtml
Clifford A. Paiva_BSMRA: Earth Temperature Variance Increase As A Function of Planetary Angular Rotation Velocity Decrease: High Correlation
Clifford A. Paiva_BSMRA: 1880-2010 MASTER Global Temp Function of Earth Rotation and GMF Decrease.xls
T.G.Barnes/C.A. Paiva in nano-teslas.xls
IGRF Geomagnetic Field Reduced Half Life Values.doc
1880-2010 MASTER Global Temp Function of Earth Rotation and GMF.xls
MASTER Earth Rotation Excess Seconds and Earth Temp_2.xls
Earth Temperature Increase Function Rotation Decrease.pdf
Earth Rotation Excess Seconds.xls
Excess Seconds Function of Rot and Temp.xls
1835-2010 GMF Function Rotation.xls
Earth's Angular Velocity Decrease.pdf
Clifford A. Paiva_BSMRA: IGRF New Geomagnetic Field Half Life Values.doc
The decay of the Earth's geomagnetic field is exceedingly dangerous to this planet as it exposes the planet's biosphere to high energy, charged particle (protons and electrons) penetrations. The geocore's joule heating flux increases as the geomagnetic field decays. The field itself is induced by circulating currents generated from the geocore's rotation through the Sun's interplanetary stellar magnetic field (Faraday Effect). As the sun slows in its rotation the Earth's induced geomagnetic field decays. The changing (decreasing) geomagnetic field induces a Lenz current in the opposite direction which further slows (through a geocore Stress Force = JxB, see electromagnetic physics included). Values are determined by the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG)
Clifford A. Paiva_BSMRA: New International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF)
2010 International Geomagnetic Reference Field Decay Data.pdf
Clifford A. Paiva_BSMRA:Global Earthquake Intensity Increase 1990-2010.pdf
Clifford A. Paiva_BSMRA:Earthquake Temporal Function 1990-2010.xls
Clifford A. Paiva_BSMRA: Perforations (Rupture) in the Disintegrating Geomagnetic Field (GMF)
Note that usage of so-called paleomagnetic extracted cores require for potassium-argon radiometric dating: [Ar-40 (argon final)] = [K-40 (potassium initial)][(Transmutation Rate)][(time]):
a. Critical: applications of radiometric dating assumptions for age determination; transmutation rates must be constant; in fact the initial potassium (K-40) is not known, the transmutation of disintegration of potassium K-40 into argon Ar-40 is also NOT constant. Futher the generation of argon Ar-40 independent of potassium K-40 does occur. Unfortunately for paleomagnetism enthusiasts, K-40 to Ar-40 is used extensively in attempted dating of assumed paleo-magnetic core extractions along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge [part of the Global Fracture System (GFS)];
b. Critical: core specimens temperatures must not rise above the curie temperature, otherwise a GMF re-alignment in the rock will occur after re-lithification, resulting in the destruction of the initial natural remanent GMF magnetization (NRM) and original primary GMF direction; futher resulting in a "new" NRM. In otherwords no volcanic thermal activity along the Global Fracture Zone (GFS) areas where the cores are extracted may be permitted. This problem alone eliminates the use of paleomagnetic data.
c. Critical: core extraction immediate region must be geophysically (seismically) stable over time; in otherwords no SEISMIC activity along the GFS areas where the cores are extracted may be permitted. This is another problem which eliminates the use of the paleomagnetic paradigm.
d. Critical: natural geomagnetic remanent magnetization (NRM) must have been acquired aligned parallel to the initial primary GMF, otherwise incorrect geomagnetic field directions intrinsic to the extracted cores exist. This cannot be assured.
e. Critical: Time of initial and properly aligned natural remanent magnetization must be obtained; the use of potassium-agron (or any other radiometric dating method) destroys this critical requirement.
NOTE: BSM Research Associates (BSMRA) completely endorses Dr. Harold S. Slusher's (University of Texas at El Paso, Physics Department) Critique of Radiometric Dating Methods published in 1970 which addresses all of the above critial paleomagnetic issues; copies of which are in residence here (BSMRA) if folks are interested. This is an excellent small text for the general reading public and addresses the very significant problems of radiometridc dating assumptions. If you are interested please call [(760) 373-1518 or (661) 373-1518], or use this site's comment-email. [Futher Data see Snelling or http://www.detectingdesign.com/carbon14.html#Difficult; http://www.detectingdesign.com/carbon14.html#Problems; http://www.icr.org/article/438/; http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n1/radioactive-http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/carbondating.htmldating; Paleomagnetism Assumption Restriction.doc]
BSMRA_Clifford Anthony Paiva Military RESUME 2009.doc
C.A.Paiva_BSMRA-Hydrothermal (HTV) Complexes Greenhouse Gases.pdf
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_Where_Not_To_Drill_Is_Precisely_Where_They_Do.doc
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA Earth Rotation Decrease
Clifford Anthony Paiva_BSMRA_Geomagnetic Field Mathematics.doc
Cliff: Hydrothermal vent zones are positioned along the primary fracture and along transform fault zones. Of course the worse area for selection of deep-sea core drilling for paleomagnetic specimens would be those areas of seismic and thermal instabilities...in other words...the Global Fracture System (GFS) and its transform fault zones. (09/03/09)
Solar storm (solar storm) frequency decreases during 2000-2009 correlate well to historical solar storm activity and the increase of H2O vapor global concentrations for the Earth. Increases in solar storms should commence in 2010. The net solar storm and earth temperature increases remain very highly correlated, especially when comparing Friis Christensen; Javarriah, Hanssen, Solanki and Lassen solar physics data. As the Sun (and Earth's) angular velocities decrease, solar storm activity increase (see Javarriah: Long Term Variations in Solar Differential Rotation and Sunspot Activity; University of California Post Prints).
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_Correlation of Apparent Temperature Decrease With Historical Solar Storm Frequency.doc 
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_Global Temperature Net Increase as a Function of Solar Rotation Decrease and Storm Activity.doc
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_Global Heating Allen A.pdf
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_Ken Allen Geophysicist Canadian Geological Survey.pdf
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_Global Heating Ken Allen B.pdf
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_Triton Heating Up.pdf
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_Global Warming on Pluto Puzzles Scientists.pdf 
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_Earth Rotation, Temperature and Geomagnetic Field Correlation.doc
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_Solar UV Radiance Increases and Earth Temperatures.doc
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_Cowling's Theorem.doc
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_Friis Christian Solar Activity and Climate.doc
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_Friis Christensen Primary Paper.pdf
BSMRA_Hansen Solar Storm Correlations 2.pdf
BSMRA_The Climatic Effects of Water Vapour_complete.doc
BSMRA_The Greenhouse Effects of Water Vapor Versus Carbon Dioxide.doc
BSMRA_BSMRA Paiva and Increased solar brightness and warming_of_the_Earth_since_1979.doc
BSMRA Earth Angular Velocity Decrease Data
Clifford Anthony Paiva_BSMRA_Friis Christensen Primary Paper.pdf
Clifford Anthony Paiva_BSMRA_Geomagnetic Field Mathematics.doc
Clifford A. Paiva Global Warming Due to Water Vapor H20v NOT Carbon Dioxide CO2.pdfCliff: This section delineates the reduction in angular velocities for the Sun, Earth and Solar System planets, with resultant increases in temperature for the system. Increases in total solar irradiance, particularly in the .1-.2 micron bandpass (UV) from the Virgo satellite is presented and stated as most dangerous to biologic systems. Anthropogenic global warming effects cannot be a significant contributor since such effects are measured for Mars and Jupiter (moons). (08/01/09)
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_International Earth Rotation Reference System Service (IERS).doc
C.A. Paiva_BSMRA_Solar Wind and Length of Day.PDF 
BSMRA_Sun and Earth Coupled Decreases in Angular Rotation.PDF 
BSMRA_Geomagnetic Field and Earth Conducting Core Rotation Through Solar Magnetic Field.PDF
BSMRA_Why Geocore Dynamos Do Not Work; Resistance And Coriolis Effects.pdf 
BSMAR_Geomagnetic Diffusion.PDF
BSMRA_Methane Ocean Floor.pdf 
Clifford Anthony Paiva_BSMRA_Geomagnetic Field Mathematics.doc
Cliff: As stated earlier just use the PDF and WORD formats for higher resolution...thanks. (10/19/08)
Cliff: Coriolis and geocore resistance forces assure that assumed helical currents in the core cannot be sustained. As the geomagnetic field intensity changes in intensity, multiplied by the product of the geocore coefficient of conductance and magnetic inductive capacitance, that product increases as induced currents are generated from the collapsing field. Also Lenz law insures a reversed inducded current is generated as the geomagnetic field decays. The reversed nature of the current generates another geomagnetic field of opposite polarity from the primary dipole field. Magnetic energy is converted with each field change into thermal joule heat within the core, mantle and lithosphere. Since geophysical applications of Cowling's Axis Symmetric Theorem demonstrates that the earth's primary dipole geomagnetic field would have diffused in approximately ten thousand years from the field's origin; and since the geomagnetic field is still in existence, then a vital need of a dynamo exists. Otherwise a 5 billion year old earth should not possess a magnetic field. At current angular velocity rotation rates for the earth, presumably generating the primary geomagnetic field as the earth rotates through the Sun's interplanetary magnetic field, and extrapolating into the the past, the spin rate of the Earth would generate a magnetic field of magnetic star strength. The joule heat from the spin rate and core electrical currents would exceed the earth's structural integrity. (10/19/08)
Cliff: Be sure to go over Professor William Tussig Scott's section concerning the earth's geomagnetic diffusion. Maximum timeline for elimination of the geomagnetic field is given by Dr. Scott as 10,000 years. If the earth is 5 billion years old this planet should not possess a magnetic field. Dr. Scott was Professor of Physics at the University of Nevada. (10/19/08)
Escalating Ice Loss Found in Antarctica
Sheets Melting in an Area Once Thought to Be Unaffected by Global Warming
By Marc Kaufman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, January 14, 2008; A01
Climatic changes (Global Heating) appear to be destabilizing vast ice sheets of western Antarctica that had previously seemed relatively protected from global warming, researchers reported yesterday, raising the prospect of faster sea-level rise than current estimates.
While the overall loss is a tiny fraction of the miles-deep ice that covers much of Antarctica, scientists said the new finding is important because the continent holds about 90 percent of Earth's ice, and until now, large-scale ice loss there had been limited to the peninsula that juts out toward the tip of South America. In addition, researchers found that the rate of ice loss in the affected areas has accelerated over the past 10 years -- as it has on most glaciers and ice sheets around the world.
"Without doubt, Antarctica as a whole is now losing ice yearly, and each year it's losing more," said Eric Rignot, lead author of a paper published online in the journal Nature Geoscience.
The Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking despite land temperatures for the continent remaining essentially unchanged, except for the fast-warming peninsula.
The cause, Rignot said, may be changes in the flow of the warmer water of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current that circles much of the continent. Because of changed wind patterns and less-well-understood dynamics of the submerged current, its water is coming closer to land in some sectors and melting the edges of glaciers deep underwater.
Hundreds of ghttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/13/AR2008011302753_pf.htmllaciers in Antarctica are melting faster as the region's climate warms, a new satellite study has revealed.
As the rivers of ice flow into the ocean, they could cause global sea levels to rise higher and faster than scientists had previously predicted.
"It is increasingly apparent that glaciers can be sensitive on much shorter time scales than traditionally thought," said lead author Hamish Pritchard of the British Antarctic Survey.
"What is telling about [the study results] is that so many glaciers are behaving in such a similar way, and so quickly," he added.
"This is strong evidence for a big change in climate on a regional scale such as has been observed."
Glaciers on Greenland are slipping into the ocean twice as fast as they were just five years ago, scientists announced today.
Current estimates already suggest that Greenland (map) is contributing to rising seas. Now it seems that those estimates may have underestimated the melting island's effect, says Eric Rignot, a glaciologist with NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena.
Some of the glaciers are accelerating, and that has happened mostly in the last five, at most ten, years. There are significant changes going on," Zwally said.
Over the last 20 years temperatures have increased by about 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit (3 degrees Celsius) along the southeast coast of Greenland, scientists say.
BSMRA_Mars Ice Cap Reduction (Melting)
BSMRA_Total Solar Radiance Increase
Clifford Anthony Paiva_BSMRA_Geomagnetic Field Mathematics.doc
BSMRA_HIRES Antarctic Larsen Shelf Melt; Suface and Submerged Fractures.PDF 
http://www.membrane.com/global_warming/notes/melting_at_both_ends.html
BSMRA_Total Solar Irradiance Increases
Clifford Anthony Paiva_BSMRA_Geomagnetic Field Mathematics.doc
[PLEASE USE CONTROL (+) FOR ZOOMS AND CONTROL (0) FOR NORMAL VIEWS]. All EXCEL plots were generated at BSMRA. The zero relationship to polarity reversal and intensity is provided. GLOBAL HEATING (WARMING): Global warming is a function of increased evaporation rates of water vapor from the the 330 million cubic miles from this ocean planet. The increased rates are a function of tidal friction among a decelerating geocore, aesthenosphere (mantle), lithosphere (crust) and oceans. Also the collapsing geomagntic field-generated geocore electrical joule heating, and increased solar storm activity (see Hansen, etc. below) play an ever increasing significant role. Increased hydrothermal venting of extremely warm waters and methane also play a major role. Methane and carbon dioxide are currently emissions with less direct effect than water vapor; being generated from the increased temperatures of the continental shelves. From the continental shelves calcium carbonates are converted to carbon dioxide (CO2). Methane (CH4), which possesses 20 times more heat capacitance than CO2, is also being released from the northern shelf areas. GEOMAGNETIC FIELD: The geomagnetic field is a primary source of joule heating within the Earth's geocore. The loss of the effective geomagnetic field in less than 1000 years will be ultimately lethal to this planet's biosphere. The increased evaporation rates at the North and South Poles will dramatically increase condensation and precipitation over the continents and probably be misinterpreted as a drop in overall climate temperatures. FROM THE LORD'S POSITION; Folks should not singularly ask the Lord Jesus Christ to prevent geophysical tragedies caused by global heating on the one hand, while continue our "legalization" of homosexual perversion (a perverted Barak Obama and his administration not withstanding) and the killing of unborn children on the other hand. God is not amused by this sort of audacious hypocracy.)
Cliff: Data seems to indicate an increase in global surface and ocean temperature as a function of planetary rotational angular velocity decrease, and period increase. Added to this geophysical phenomenon is the space physics phenomenon of Earth's conductive core rotational decrease through the Sun's interplanetary magnetic field, thus decreasing the induced geomagnetic field intensity. (02/03/10)
Cliff: As the earth's electrically conductive geocore's angular velocity decreases (spinning through the sun's interplanetary magnetic field), the induced geomagnetic field commensurately decreases; as the graph indicates. (02/15/10)