CLIFFORD A. PAIVA RESEARCHES: Space Physics; Defense Sciences

c. increased solar storm intensity (see associated PDFs) and reduced time between storms;

d. slowing of equatorial rotation of the Sun (see associated PDFs) resulting in angular momentum conservation processes, and increased internal friction, for the Solar System;

e. changing geomagnetic field (decay; see geomagnetic field decay section) resulting in increased induced electrical currents and joule heating within the Earth's geocore;

The primary source of methane, carbon dioxide and greenhouse gases, although the plot distributions are not highly correlated to the Hansen solar and geo-climate data, is attributed to the global distribution of hydrothermal vents. (Note:  although it is often said that these HTV bio-communities exist independently of the sun, some of the organisms are actually dependent upon oxygen produced by photosynthetic organisms ; also all energy is derived ultimately from the Sun).

C.A. Paiva: Decay of the Earth's Geomagnetic Field (GMF): Disintegration of the High Energy Radiation Protection Barrier; (Keys: Faraday Disk; Homopolar generator, induced current, exponential decay, Thomas G. Barnes, Harold S. Slusher, Lorentz Force, James Clerk Maxwell)

The Earth's geocore's electric current density [sE + swxrxHm)] decreases as the disk (geocore) slows in its rotation through the solar magnetic field; the Earth's geomagnetic field commensurately decreasing.  The current density equation uses v=wxr for the Earth's rotational angular momentum; H_solar representing the Sun's magnetic field. 1/(mse) is the geomagnetic diffusion coefficient to be derived later in this section. This effect (planetary rotational and geomagnetic decrease) occurs for all planets within the solar system, including those with highest rotational spins and whose fields are also decaying (Jupiter, Saturn Neptune and Uranus).  Since the Earth’s geomagnetic field is nearly symmetrical, a homopolar generator system (described in nearly all Earth sciences texts) cannot be used; as asymmetry results for all hompolar dynamo models.  The Earth’s geomagnetic intrinsic field is symmetrical unless interacted upon by external fields (solar plasma and planetary magnetic fields).  In any case Cowling’s Theorem precludes the possibility of symmetric dynamos. 

One may attempt exotic assumed fluid motions with the geocore to establish an external symmetric toroidal field, however the model may not be representative of actual geocore physical processes.  The geomagnetic field should have dissipated in 10,000 years using the geomagnetic diffusion formula (see Professor Tussig Scott’s calculation in PDF). In any case field polarity reversals are not related to field intensities. Therefore even if geomagnetic reversals where physically real, all reversals result in increased entropies and the geocore induced currents intensity reduction. The Earth’s geomagnetic field is dying and its deflection force F=qE + q wxrxH_solarm commensurately.  The Earth’s geomagnetic field decays as a direct function of the reduction of wxrxH_solarm,  deflection force f= (geocore rotational velocity)x(geocore radius)x(solar magnetic field intensity).  The cosmic ray and charged particle deflection force protecting the Earth likewise disintegrates.    

While employed as a physicist at the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Laboratory, Virginia, I was presented with the opportunity to interact with the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).  Professor Taylor of that military geopolitical institution was (and is) on staff also at Richmond University School of Law.  Robert Gates (current Secretary of Defense) ordered the research of the Noah’s Ark files when he was Director of Central Intelligence (1994).  (Curious that he is silent concerning this world-shaking event of the discovery the ship at the 15,500 foot altitude.)

Specifically Dr. Taylor asked me to provide image-processing analyses on the Mt. Ararat anomaly Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) reduced classification frames; and to check on the possible correlation to Noah’s Ark.  These of these investigations were published in the Washington Times Insight Magazine, 2 November 2000.  My conclusions indicate that the anomaly is probably geological in etiology, with some cultural activity associated to the structure.  It (the anomaly) certainly is not consistent with either Genesis Chapter 6, nor with the eyewitness accounts of George Hagopian (1902) and  Hagi Yaraim (1857).